Experimental Estimation of Fundamental Period and Damping Ratio of an Elevated Water Tank Based on Forced Vibration Test
Abstract
Elevated water tanks are critical lifeline structures whose seismic performance depends strongly on their dynamic characteristics, particularly the fundamental period and damping ratio. Numerical models often rely on simplifications that may not capture real behavior. This study presents an experimental forced vibration test on a 600 m³ reinforced concrete elevated water tank in Rudsar, Iran, to determine its fundamental period and damping ratio under different water levels. A shaker (Pooya5000) was installed on the roof, and harmonic excitation was applied at frequencies up to 8 Hz. Accelerations were recorded, processed using SeismoSignal (bandpass filter 0.5–7 Hz), and compared with finite element (SAP2000) and analytical (Housner-type) models. Results show that the experimentally obtained fundamental periods (0.525–0.554 s for water depths 2.35–3.63 m) are significantly lower than FEM (0.74–0.77 s) and analytical (0.70–0.73 s) predictions. The average damping ratio from free vibration decay was only 0.89%, attributed to the very low excitation amplitude (elastic range). This study highlights the necessity of experimental validation for dynamic analysis and suggests that current code-based period formulas may overestimate flexibility in such structures.
Keywords:
Forced vibration test, Elevated water tank, Fundamental period, Damping ratio, SAP2000, Fluid-structure interactionReferences
- [1] Housner, G. W. (1954). Earthquake pressures on fluid containers. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/eewgr-ay603
- [2] Haroun, M. A., & Housner, G. W. (1981). Seismic design of liquid storage tanks. Journal of the technical councils of asce, 107(1), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTCAD9.0000080
- [3] Bahreini Toussi, I. (2016). Experimental and numerical investigation of liquid storage tanks under seismic excitation [Thesis]. http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-266
- [4] Shakib, H., & Alemzadeh, H. (2017). The effect of earthquake site-source distance on dynamic response of concrete elevated water tanks. Procedia engineering, 199, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.020
- [5] Yu, E. (2005). Forced vibration testing and analytical modeling of a four-story reinforced concrete frame building [Thesis]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e2e03c6bd3093a3769e5a44566a05122/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- [6] Jacobsen, E. D. (2011). Forced vibration testing and analysis of pre-and post-retrofit buildings [Thesis]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/22a9409808e9e168fde8cd77450e396a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- [7] Housner, G. W. (1963). The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 53(2), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020381
- [8] American Concrete Institute. (2020). ACI 350.3-20 seismic design of liquid-containing concrete structures. https://studylib.net/doc/27979290/aci-350.03-2020-analysis-and-desing-of-liquid-containing-.
- [9] Purnama, A. Y., Rifa’i, A., & Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2018). Fuel tank foundation improvement system on soft soil layer based on 3D numerical simulation. GEOMATE journal, 14(41), 13–18. https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/3198
- [10] Patel, J. J., Patel, C. N., & Patel, H. S. (2014). Fluid-structure interaction approaches for seismic behavior of elevated water tank. National conference on recent advances in civil and structural engineering (racse-14). ADIT & BVM. https://studylib.net/doc/25714140/fluid-structure-interaction
- [11] Font, A. M. (2014). Dynamic testing of an elevated water tank [Thesis]. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2373/
- [12] Brownjohn, J., Bocian, M., & Hester, D. (2017). Forced vibration testing of footbridges using calibrated human shaker and wireless sensors. Procedia engineering, 199, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.134